From advanced sensors and artificial intelligence to big data and 5G networks, digital health technologies are creating new opportunities for biotechs and pharmaceutical companies. What’s more, as the general population becomes increasingly familiar with these technologies in their homes — not only to monitor their own health, but also to have better communication with healthcare providers via telemedicine visits — the remote monitoring aspect of these technologies can enable physicians to intervene based on real-time data.
Additionally, with regard to clinical trials, connected medical devices and wearables have facilitated the growth and adoption of digital endpoints, which are more responsive to change than traditional site-based outcome assessments. These endpoints are currently being used mostly as supplementary endpoints, having the potential to support patient outcomes at every stage of a patient’s clinical trial journey.
To maximise the value of incorporating digital endpoints into a clinical trial, sponsors will need to understand how to implement an end-to-end approach. At ICON, our framework maps the transition from device selection to digital endpoint validation, which leads to a better understanding of the operational excellence needed for managing data and mitigating risks.
Step 1: Adopt a patient-centred approach
Using a patient-centred framework that has evolved from proven clinical outcome assessment (COA) principles and techniques can help build the evidence required for submission to regulatory bodies. Previously, the industry has focused on the selection of devices for use in clinical trials, and not the endpoints. Today, however, sponsors must shift their attention to endpoints, particularly those that are meaningful to patients.
In some instances, endpoints may be focused on assessing improvement in everyday functioning, while in others, it will be about measuring stability or deterioration in a condition — how quickly, and by how much. Once sponsors understand which outcomes are meaningful to patients, they then can begin to identify and select the optimal measures to assess these endpoints.
Step 2: Select the device
After identifying relevant, patient-centred endpoints, sponsors can next consider device selection, which includes device identification, patient acceptance testing, and technical usability and feasibility testing.
Sponsors will need to select the evidentiary requirements necessary to support device selection, including any gaps that need addressing. Collecting evidence could include using existing literature, developing a validation plan or using an industry-led endpoint qualification. COA instruments may be applied to help fill gaps and evidentiary needs.
Further, sponsors will have to consider how to collect and interpret data from the device and establish meaningful change thresholds for each novel digital endpoint.
Step 3: Adhere to operational excellence in digital endpoints
Operations are essential to ensure robust, accurate and compliant data collection. Overlooking operational excellence can jeopardise the endpoint.
Here, sponsors will need to consider the end-to-end process holistically and implement risk contingencies, including data management and compliance. For example, sponsors will need to decide how to manage missing data, whether random (e.g., patient takes device off in the shower) or not (e.g., patient takes device off because it is itchy), to ensure the data collected throughout the study remains usable.
Also, patients will need training on their devices and how data will be shared. As such, sponsors should set up patient support including direct outreach, reminder apps and dedicated help desks to keep patients compliant and engaged. Moreover sponsors should provide plans to capture and address non-compliance with regard to when, where and how often a device is worn and the loss or malfunction of a device. Lastly, sites and study staff should be trained on devices, and equipped and prepared with firewalls, ample storage and technology support.
The digital transformation is here
Digital health technologies provide new ways to gather data, while relieving stresses and burdens to patients. Clinical trial processes will become increasingly driven by large real-world data, interoperability and advanced computing power with the potential to accelerate drug approvals. As more digital technologies enter the market and become increasingly integrated into clinical research, we will begin to witness a shift from digital endpoints used as supplementary to primary endpoints. Moreover, sensor technology will advance, leading to a rise in clinical grade wearables, and increasing the quality and value of the data they provide, further spurring growth in the wearables market.
However, implementation brings new challenges, including patient acceptance, device suitability, data management complexity, and privacy and security issues. Having a strategic partner with wearables and COA expertise can help to mitigate risks and lead to the successful use of digital endpoints.
Learn more about our end-to-end approach for supporting wearables and digital endpoints in clinical trials in our white paper, Advancing digital endpoints: An end-to-end approach to managing wearable devices through clinical development.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel