Adapting clinical trial protocols can help to keep participants enrolled and receiving treatments and assessments.
The integrity of more than 330,000 clinical trials listed on ClinicalTrials.gov remains threatened as the COVID-19 outbreak continues to spread globally. Further, as of March 26, at least 18 biotech or pharma companies have reported a disruption to a clinical trial as a result of this pandemic.
The biopharma industry’s shift in focus on developing vaccines and therapies in response to COVID-19 — along with the burden this crisis is placing on medical centres worldwide — is having the unintended consequence of potentially disrupting clinical trials for other diseases. Yet, keeping these trials on track is essential to bringing much needed treatments and is possible if we look to be innovative in approach.
Minimising the impact of COVID-19 on study timelines starts with identifying instances of predicted delays, and then developing study-specific plans to mitigate risks. Adapting clinical trial protocols to include direct-to-patient support, in-home and alternative site clinical services, and remote monitoring, can all help to keep participants enrolled and receiving treatments and assessments. Other services, such as FIRECREST, can offer pre-recorded investigator meetings and remote site training to ensure compliance.
Challenges facing clinical trials
For ongoing studies, the main concerns amid the COVID-19 pandemic is the safety of patients. Many people enrolled in trials, may be vulnerable to infection, and travelling to sites could be detrimental if exposed to COVID-19. Further, some patients who are receiving treatments require intensive medical assessment, which may prove difficult during the outbreak.
Another risk COVID-19 may pose to clinical trials is an unwillingness on the part of patients to enroll in new trials, patient dropout and noncompliance due to travel restrictions and quarantined areas. According to a study conducted from March 12-13 by Continuum Clinical, 39 percent of US sites surveyed said they believe patients will be much less or somewhat less likely to enroll in new clinical research trials.
Other considerations include increased patient anxiety and hesitancy to visit healthcare facilities, and the contamination risk between patients, sites and the community.
Bringing the trial to the patient
A solution to these challenges includes deploying In-home clinical services to protect the safety of patients and medical staff. In fact, regulatory agencies are supporting incorporating these services into trials. For example, the FDA published a guidance in March 2020 advising sponsors to evaluate alternative methods of patient safety assessments that can be deployed during times when travelling to sites may be restricted.
Deploying healthcare professionals that are trained to carry out a wide range of services and tests in the patient’s home can reduce anxiety, and increase comfort and convenience. In addition, in-home services reduce travel burden, ensuring compliance and data collection. Also, using in-home services can reduce the risk of patient dropout, enhancing retention.
COVID-19 clinical operations
Keeping your clinical trial on track in an evolving environment.
Operationalising services to manage potential risks
Introducing in-home services benefits researchers and patients. To minimise risks to clinical trials, sponsors may need to adapt protocols to for compliance, outcomes measurement and trial recruitment. By working to sustain ongoing trials, millions of people — especially those with chronic conditions, rare diseases and cancer — can reap the benefits of a new therapy once the COVID-19 pandemic ends.
At ICON, our In-Home and Alternative Site Clinical Solutions study teams (through Symphony Clinical Research) are continuing to review how they can support clients and are working with sites and regulatory agencies to reduce the impact of COVID-19.
For more information on ICON's Patient Recruitment & Engagement Services:
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel