Deirdre Albertson
Jack Martin, MD
ICON recognises that the COVID-19 pandemic will have an impact on the conduct of ongoing and newly initiating clinical trials.
This is of particular concern for cardiovascular (CV) and metabolic trials because the subjects recruited are typically older (>50 years) with underlying cardiovascular disease and/or diabetes. Based on current epidemiological data, these are the individuals that may be at higher risk of contracting COVID-19 and portend a worse prognosis (Wang D et al, JAMA 2020;323(11):1061-1069). Consequently, they may be unwilling or unable to attend study specific visits or procedures due to imposed quarantines, restricted access to healthcare facilities, and limited availability of site staff or even temporary closure of a site. Ensuring the safety of trial subjects is paramount while maintaining study integrity.
Several cardiovascular implications have emerged as our understanding of the COVID-19 pandemic evolves that could have an impact on ongoing cardiometabolic trials. One of them focuses on the use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). Many participants can be anticipated to be taking an ACE inhibitor or an ARB but might be considering to discontinue these drugs in light of (preclinical) findings that suggests ACE inhibitors and ARBs could potentially increase the risk of COVID-19 infection. Currently, there is no clinical data to support an adverse or beneficial effect with use of these therapies in COVID-19 or persons with CV disease. Although these concerns raise the need for additional research, the American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association and the European Society of Cardiology (Council of Hypertension) recommend continuation of ACE inhibitors/ARBs in accordance with indications for which they have shown benefit. Investigators are urged to discuss this information with their trial participants. Discontinuation of these therapies could impact subject safety, potentially confound endpoint assessments and affect the scientific integrity of the study.
Reports of elevations in hs-cTnI and natriuretic peptides (NT-pro-BNP or BNP) levels have been observed in patients infected with COVID-19. A rise and fall in troponin (indicating myocardial injury) is common among persons with an acute respiratory illness; elevation in natriuretic peptides is also common (even in the absence of clinical heart failure). In trials where these biomarkers are routinely being assessed (such as heart failure trials or for cardiac safety assessment), interpretation of clinically significant elevations may be challenging in light of COVID-19. Changes could be related to infection with the virus (and necessitate appropriate testing) or may reflect exacerbation of an underlying CV condition, based on clinical signs and symptoms and/or electrocardiographic changes. Detailed documentation of decisions in these situations will be necessary.
COVID-19 clinical operations
Keeping your clinical trial on track in an evolving environment.
Key study endpoints in CV trials often require specialised testing (e.g., invasive procedures, advanced non-invasive cardiac imaging and functional testing, etc.). These tests may only be available in large hospital centers where access may be restricted and the risk for exposure to COVID-19 is heightened. As such, trial participants may be unwilling or unable to undergo the protocol specific procedure(s). To minimise the potential for missing data, alternative testing sites, which may require certification by core laboratories, may need to be considered, if available. If this is not feasible, it may be necessary to extend the window for the testing procedure, depending on the study specific scientific merits as well as participant burden. These protocol deviations will need to be carefully tracked and documented. Drop out of some sites or subjects may skew the data if the affected subjects may not be representative of the general study population. The handling of missing critical endpoint data due to COVID-19 will need to be discussed in the statistical analysis plan.
Facilitating continuity of care, ensuring appropriate medical oversight, minimising missed visits/procedures, and provision of investigational product may be challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic. There may be an increase in the use of telephone visits, where allowed by the protocol, or the protocol may need to be amended to permit the use of phone visits. Home health agencies may need to be employed to perform key safety assessments, collect blood for safety laboratory testing and/or administer study drug, depending on the mode of administration.
Communication with investigators and trial participants is all the more critical during the COVID-19 pandemic. The safety of each trial participant and the risks of continued participation in the study need to be weighed against the potential benefits. To ensure a prompt response to questions related to the study and COVID-19, we strongly recommend the use of a study specific COVID-19 email address for correspondence. This process can assure that all site questions are rapidly triaged to the appropriate member of the cross functional team and that all team members are aware of the plan of action.
Learn more about our range of services to keep your clinical trial on track during the COVID-19 pandemic. To speak with one of our cardiovascular and metabolic disease experts, please contact us.
Cardiovascular, Metabolic and Circulation insights
ICON's Cardiovascular team contributes regularly to industry publications and media coverage of cardiovascular clinical trials. Stay up to date with ICON's latest thought leadership on cardiovascular clinical trials.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption whitepaper
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
AI at ICON
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel