Introduction
The prevalence of obesity has increased rapidly worldwide in adults and children. In the US over 14 million children, including 22% of adolescents, meet criteria for obesity, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics. The most common cause of obesity in children and adolescents is a caloric imbalance with excess calories consumed without being spent through activity. Efforts to treat pediatric obesity typically involve increasing exercise and improving dietary intake. This has had limited success on long-term weight loss. With the increasing development of drug treatments for obesity in adults in recent years, sponsors may wish to investigate possible pediatric obesity treatments. In this blog, we outline some of the considerations for the design and execution of pediatric obesity studies.
Obesity in childhood
Obesity is a complex disease involving multiple factors such as genetics, biology, physiology and social factors. Pediatric obesity is further complicated by family, developmental and societal factors that clinicians need to consider when choosing a treatment. Many of the behaviours around food and activity are developed in early childhood, led by parents and caregivers. However, these behaviours can change throughout our lives with physical, cognitive, social and developmental changes. For younger children and infants, parents and caregivers decide which foods to provide. These may include highly processed, calorie dense food. Conversely, parents who overly restrict food may result in children to overconsuming processed foods when they reach school age or adolescence. Physical activity also changes throughout childhood due to school schedules and technology use. Video games, smartphone and computer use in adolescence can further limit opportunities for physical activity.1
Patient selection considerations
When selecting participants for a pediatric trial, sponsors must weigh the risk of exposure to the study drug against the consequences of continued obesity. Alongside this are the factors which should be considered in patient selection for any pediatric trial: age, severity of the condition, pubertal maturity and whether the patient has comorbid conditions. FDA guidance recommends identifying the causes of obesity through a medical assessment as well as screening for comorbidities including glucose intolerance and hypertension. Medication can be considered for children as young as six years old who have severe obesity according to the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Trials for older and younger children should be performed separately because of their different cognitive and developmental stages. For younger children there will be more parental involvement than for adolescents.
Comorbidities and endpoint selection
Pediatric obesity has a number of associated comorbidities and patients may be using other medications. Some of these medications may affect weight, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, stimulants, insulin and metformin. Obesity is also associated with a number of liver abnormalities known as metabolic-dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Central obesity, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidaemia and hypertension are associated with MASLD. Obesity is a risk factor for obstructive sleep apnoea for children and adolescents. This leads to disordered sleep and impacts school performance, behaviour and social engagement. Children and teenagers with obesity may also deal with psychosocial issues such as depression, social isolation, bullying, low self-esteem and reduced quality of life. Obesity may be stigmatised and compared to non-obese peers, young people with obesity are more likely to be bullied at school. The emotional and psychological effects of childhood obesity can continue much later in life.
In pediatric obesity trials, primary endpoint selection goes beyond the standard benchmarks of adult trials. Regulatory agencies provide limited guidance. Consequently, there is a lot of debate about what may be appropriate. Some proposals are to present data to allow comparison of efficacy for example the absolute and percentage change in BMI, change in percentage the 95th BMI percentile, or change in percentage of the median. Novel endpoints beyond weight loss could be linked to improvements in some of the various metabolic, orthopaedic, psychological or endocrinologic comorbidities.
Overcoming challenges to patient enrolment and retention
Parents often underestimate their children’s weight and associated comorbidities. Parents who do not recognise their children are overweight are less likely to provide the necessary support to help their children achieve a healthy weight.2 Reaching these parents and educating them about the negative health impacts of childhood obesity is a prerequisite to their clinical trial enrolment. Childhood obesity is also more prevalent in some groups such as Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black children.3 These groups tend to be clinical trial naïve or hesitant and their enrolment in clinical trials is relatively low. Sponsors should consider a study campaign designed to support diversity and inclusivity. Selection of study sites should be informed by their accessibility to these groups. Mobile research units could be used to support enrolment and retention for people unable to travel.
Creating engaging educational materials for parents and children is essential to explain the importance of the study and their roles in participating. During study design sponsors should be aware of the possible burdens of on-site visits, fasting labs, blood draws, patient reported outcomes and other requirements. Limiting these burdens or offering alternatives that reduce them may help with patient retention. These could include using home health visits, electronic tools to record patient-reported outcomes and providing pain- and anxiety-reducing tools.
Sponsors should also give participants and their caregivers strategies to manage unwanted side effects such as nausea and diarrhoea. Potential concerns about suicidal thoughts or actions should be addressed in discussion and with supporting materials. Questions and conversations throughout the trial should be encouraged and supported by the study team.
Conclusion
Treating the growing problem of childhood obesity calls for exploring new approaches and treatments. Developing these treatments will require gathering safety and efficacy data through well-designed clinical trials. Pediatric clinical trials need to be designed and executed by experienced teams following regulatory guidelines. These teams and their trials need to be patient-centric to ensure they can enrol and retain pediatric patients with their caregivers’ support.
Contact us to explore how ICON can support your pediatric clinical trial requirements.
This article was first published on Pharmafocus on 4 June 2024.
References
1 Hampl SE, Hassink SG, Skinner AC, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Obesity. Pediatrics. 2023;151(2).
2 Abbas N, Rouaiheb H, Saliba J, El‑Bikai R. Childhood obesity: Facts and parental perceptions. World Acad Sci J. 2023;5(6):38.
3 Childhood Obesity Facts. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood-obesity-facts/childhood-obesity-facts.html. Updated April 2 2024. Accessed 18 November, 2024.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel