Effective communication in clinical trials is not a ‘nice to have’ luxury, it’s a necessity. Clear, accurate and accessible information is a fundamental foundation of any successful trial, ensuring participants stay informed, engaged and confident in their ongoing involvement. As clinical studies expand across multiple countries and regions, the need for seamless communication across languages barriers has become more important than ever.
So how can we navigate this complex linguistic landscape while preserving the integrity of the original message and keep participants well informed?
Navigating the language landscape
Clinical trials often involve participants from diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds, especially as studies span multiple countries. This diversity enriches research but also introduces a significant challenge: ensuring that all participants thoroughly understand the trials’ purpose, procedures, and associated risks. Miscommunication or misunderstanding due to language barriers can lead to confusion, mistrust, or even disengagement. That’s why delivering clear, consistent and culturally appropriate communications in participants local language is essential.
The challenge of translation sourcing
Many clinical sponsors and contract research organisations (CROs) frequently turn to third party language service providers to manage the translation needs of their clinical trials. On the surface, this approach seems practical, as these providers often offer access to specialised linguistic expertise that might not be readily available in house. However, this method can come with significant risks that are often overlooked.
There is often potential for cohorts of language service providers to be unfamiliar with the nuances of clinical trials, and the organisations hiring them typically have little to no visibility into the providers processes or quality control measures.
This creates a precarious situation. Inaccurate, inconsistent, or poorly localised translations specifically within the context of clinical trials can have a domino effect, starting with the erosion of trust among participants. Misunderstanding due to mistranslations or lack of cultural context can cause confusion about the trial’s procedures, consent forms, or associated risks, ultimately jeopardising participant engagement and safety. Even small errors can lead to significant setbacks, non-compliance or worse – compromising the scientific validity of the study itself. The entire research processes hinges on precise communication and when that is compromised, so is the integrity of the trial.
The stakes being incredible high, with consequences of poor translations reverberating through the entire clinical trial, one key question is paramount: How can sponsors and CROs effectively source translations from providers who not only have the necessary linguistic expertise but also a deep understanding of clinical trial protocols, regulatory requirements and cultural nuances?
The challenge is finding a translation partner that can consistently delivery high quality accurate translations and build a foundation of trust throughout the entire end to end trial process.
ICON's solution: In-house language services
At ICON we found a solution: Rather than trying to source a supplier that meets a very specific set of requirements, we built the Language Service provider we are looking for. As a result, ICON’s in-house Language Services (ILS) division was created.
Self-empowered and fully integrated into ICON’s process and procedures, ICON’s Language Services tackle clinical trial translation challenges directly. ICON maintains strict control over every step of the translation process through a dedicated team, working seamlessly with sponsor specific study teams, ensuring all translations are managed with the highest level of dedicated and expertise needed for Clinical Trial components.
Sponsors across the industry trust ICON not only for clinical expertise but also for its commitment to detail and quality control. By applying the same proven model of service excellence that ICON is renowned for, we ensure our language services meet the highest standards of accuracy, consistency, cultural sensitivity and compliance we know is needed.
With full end to end oversight, ICON Language Services offers a seamless integrated solution that eliminates the risk of using unfamiliar external providers. Our translation processes are handled by experts with deep backgrounds in clinical trials, regulatory affairs and operations, and language models ensuring that all trial communications are managed with the expertise and care needed from start to finish.
Contact us to learn more about how ICON’s Language Services can enhance your clinical trials through effective communication.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel