Up to 80% of children and their families experience pediatric medical trauma after medical interactions or significant illnesses. Patient-centric pediatric clinical trials can help mitigate the risk of potentially life-long implications of medical trauma and improve trial outcomes.
Many children dislike going to the doctor. It can be a stressful experience at best, frightening and traumatic at worst. Children in clinical trials must typically undergo more procedures and engage in clinical activities more often, increasing their exposure to potentially stressful or even traumatising experiences. On this World Children’s Day, we are placing the spotlight on an important challenge in pediatric clinical trials — pediatric medical trauma.
Pediatric medical trauma is troublingly common, and thanks to the efforts of advocates like those in the Pediatric Medical Trauma Working Group, it is well-documented and mitigation strategies are available. However, there is a stark lack of research on its impact in clinical trials. To ensure safe and effective pediatric clinical trials, we must understand the potential effects of pediatric medical trauma and create strategies that maximise a positive patient experience, mitigate trauma and influence long-term health outcomes.
The Pediatric Medical Trauma Working Group shared their personal and professional insights in a recent panel with ICON's SPACE (Supporting Parents and Carers Everywhere), outlining some of the challenges, potential solutions and the mutual benefit of mitigation strategies for patients and the trial operations.
What is pediatric medical trauma?
Pediatric medical traumatic stress is a complex set of psychological and physiological responses exhibited by children and their families in the face of pain, injury, serious illness, medical procedures and invasive or distressing treatment experiences1. The physical, psychological and emotional distress, anxiety and fear can lead to conditions like post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which can profoundly affect a child's quality of life with long-term impact.
The prevalence of pediatric medical trauma is staggering – up to 80% of children and their families experience it after routine medical interactions or during management of severe acute or chronic illnesses. Between 25-30% of cases lead to even more severe outcomes, including intrusive thoughts, nightmares and severe or panic-level anxiety. Such stress disrupts daily functioning, hampers optimal recovery, impacts medical decision-making, and also reduces adherence to recommended medical treatment. These problems compound and result in consequences that can endure throughout the child’s life.
Expert insights on pediatric medical trauma
ICON's SPACE (Supporting Parents and Carers Everywhere) community group invited members of a dedicated Pediatric Medical Trauma Working Group, comprised of members from varied backgrounds to join a panel discussion for ICON employees to share their personal experiences and insights on pediatric medical trauma in clinical trials.
The expert panel members included:
- Jacqui Whiteway brings more than 18 years experience in clinical research to her current role as Senior Director and Head Pediatric Strategy Liaison in ICON’s Centre for Pediatric Clinical Development (CPCD). Driven by compassionate curiosity from her time as a scientist through working in a CRO environment providing input on hundreds of trials, Jacqui’s passion for pediatric clinical development arises from the need to devise optimal approaches for conducting challenging studies so that we can get safe therapeutics to children sooner.
- Aaron Horowitz, Co-founder and CEO, Empath Labs: As a child he grew up with human growth hormone deficiency, giving himself shots throughout childhood to grow, through which he developed an immense sense of empathy and desire to support kids who are going through difficult medical treatments. His company creates different kinds of interactive companions that children care for in ways that reflect their own care journey.
- Cristol Barrett O'Loughlin, Founder and CEO, Angel Aid Cares: Cristol had three older brothers with a fatal rare genetic disease called Hunter syndrome who passed away at 12, 18 and 19 years old. Through this, she gained an intimate understanding of the daily demand and chronic traumatic experience of caregiving in a palliative care environment. Angel Aid provides mental health and wellness tools as well as daily and weekly support groups for caregivers.
- Melissa J. Hogan, Healthcare attorney, writer and consultant: Melissa’s profession as a healthcare attorney became unexpectedly useful when her youngest son was diagnosed with Hunter Syndrome at age two. The initial flood of positivity at finding a clinical trial for her son ebbed during the demanding first year of the first-in-human trial. Although she didn’t yet have the name for it, her son had experienced medical trauma and she didn’t have the resources to help them through it. To provide resources for other families, she co-authored a book with a leading expert on pediatric medical trauma, called “Afraid of the doctor: Every parent’s guide to preventing and managing medical trauma.”
- Jana Benesh, Director of Therapeutic Expertise, ICON Centre for Rare Diseases: Although a neuroscientist by training, Jana was drawn to clinical development after her young son was diagnosed with a rare neurological disease. Beginning during the years he participated in clinical research, her son experiences ongoing medical trauma from the frequent hospital visits and regular invasive procedures and treatments he receives. At ICON, she uses these personal experiences – and those gained from working with other rare disease families and patient advocacy organisations, and facilitating investigator-initiated and sponsored research programs at clinics – to help design studies that utilise optimal endpoints and limit participation burdens in rare disease clinical research.
Improving pediatric clinical trial design
Pediatric medical trauma has been a proverbial elephant in the room for some time, though it hasn’t yet been addressed in the industry. There is risk of trauma in all pediatric clinical trials for both the pediatric participants and their families. Addressing this risk early, by optimising trial design and protocol development, is the best solution to enhance the participant and family experience and improve clinical trial outcomes. Aaron Horowitz emphasised that mitigating medical trauma in trial design could improve adherence to the protocol, improve retention and ultimately decrease protocol deviations.
As clinical researchers, the panelists shared that minimising the risk of medical trauma has a multifaceted set of benefits that can improve the mental health and well-being of children and their families with ripple effects that benefit the trials themselves. As Melissa J. Hogan aptly summarised, "There really is an ROI on this and a win-win in terms of knowledge, education and implementation."
Improving pediatric patient experience
Only now that we are highlighting this “elephant in the room,” can industry directly employ tools and strategies to mitigate pediatric medical trauma in clinical trials. The Pediatric Medical Trauma Working Group shared some of the methods they employ and avenues for further development, including protocol design to identify and mitigate potential trauma, ways to provide support for children during trials and various methods to help families navigate the clinical trial process. Recognising this issue and implementing strategies to mitigate trauma can significantly enhance clinical trial outcomes and the experience for patients and their families.
As we delve deeper into this uncharted territory, this focus on patient centricity and addressing paediatric medical trauma in clinical trials now promises a brighter, more healthful and empathetic future for all involved while getting safe medicines to children sooner.
Partner with ICON to gain deeper insight into your patients’ journey and design more patient-centric clinical trials informed by our experience on more than 399 pediatric trials in the last five years.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption whitepaper
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel