Immunotherapy technologies are rapidly advancing, as are the methods of ensuring their safety and reliability. ICON explores the tools used in cell and gene therapy (CGT) trials.
CGT involves the use of genes or cells to treat a disease. With cell-based therapies the cells can either be derived from the patient (autologous) or from a donor (allogeneic). Cell-based therapies such as CAR-T cells are engineered using viral vectors to express receptors that recognize tumor antigens resulting in attack and destruction of the tumor cells. Patients receiving CAR-T therapies first undergo chemotherapeutic pre-treatment before transduced cells are infused into their bodies. This pre-treatment results in lymphodepletion which helps prolong the persistence of infused therapeutic cells. These patients then face a period of immune system reconstitution; throughout this time, there is a series of follow-up visits to monitor the patient’s health and determine the expansion and persistence of the CAR-T cells.
PCR and qPCR assays for PK and safety monitoring
ICON’s CGT team have developed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays that have applications in a myriad of cell therapies, from patient selection (to identify the cell therapy target in solid tumors) to baseline assessments, and pharmacokinetic (PK) monitoring of clinical drug products.
PCR tools enable the rapid amplification of a segment of DNA or cDNA. The PCR exponentially amplify the number of copies of a specific DNA fragment or transcript, which allows for detection and quantification of the nucleic acid sequences that are of interest.
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) differ in performance characteristics and are therefore used for different applications. Unlike qPCR, ddPCR offers absolute quantitation without the need for calibrators. ddPCR is more sensitive than qPCR, which improves precision and reproducibility at low inputs. However, qPCR is an established and robust technology that offers a wide dynamic range and higher throughput for sample testing.
ddPCR is an emerging technology used for the accurate and sensitive quantification of viral vector sequences that are found in CAR-T and other cell-based therapies. The detection and quantification of vector copy numbers (VCN) in DNA extracted from a whole blood or PBMC sample can be used to monitor the persistence and potential expansion of the engineered cell therapy in the patient’s bloodstream following infusion.
One challenge that the lab faces when performing VCN testing is the low DNA yields from blood samples that are collected at early timepoints post-infusion. The low DNA yields are a result of lymphodepletion. In addition to low yields, the isolated DNA can be fragmented, due to apoptosis caused by the chemotherapeutics. This fragmentation greatly reduces the quality of the DNA in the sample. Therefore, ICON’s researchers have developed methods and strategies to overcome this challenge: one strategy involves the performance of a reduced mass input (RMI) study during assay validation. ICON’s RMI studies involve the testing of several mass inputs that are below the standard input to assess the lowest possible input allowed that will not compromise the safety or the reliability of the data.
Monitoring the safety of gene therapies
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy requires a retrovirus or lentivirus to introduce the CAR gene into activated T cells. A safety concern with using retroviral/lentiviral vectors for this treatment is the potential for replication competent retrovirus or lentivirus (RCR/RCL) to arise. The emergence of RCR or RCL could result in development of vector-associated malignancies. The FDA has posed safety concerns with the possibility of RCR/RCL being created and recommend monitoring of patients who have received CAR-T therapy. qPCR assays are used for RCR and RCL monitoring.
The FDA offers guidance on the testing of replication-competent retrovirus (RCR) during the manufacturing of these therapy products and the follow-up with patients who have received these treatments. The testing schedule, as suggested by the FDA, includes pre-treatment testing and post-treatment testing three times throughout the first year and yearly for up to 15 years following treatment. At the manufacturing stage, the FDA guidance includes the identification of sample type (PBMC) and required sensitivity of the test (50 copies/µg DNA) as well as general testing methods (qPCR).
Looking forward with ICON
ICON’s cell and gene therapy team leverages their experience in the industry to deliver all phases of clinical trials, from the early phase to commercialisation. ICON has had a role in over 130 CGT trials in 23 countries, and as an early pioneer of CGT, ICON was also part of four of the seven approved CAR-T therapy programs available today.
The rapid and continued growth of CGTs over the last decade shows great promise for those suffering from serious diseases. But as new developments arise, so will safety considerations and concerns; however, ICON’s innovative CGT team will be there to help create a safer and more efficient treatment landscape for our sponsors and their patients.
Learn more about ICON’s work in cell and gene therapies here
Listen to our on-demand webinar: Best practices for laboratory solutions relating to cell and gene therapy clinical trials.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption whitepaper
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
AI at ICON
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel