On January 31, 2023 the EU Clinical Trial Regulation and the Clinical Trial Information System went live and changed the European landscape for clinical trials.
The EU Clinical Trial Regulation (CTR) and Clinical Trial Information System (CTIS) are simplifying the process of clinical trials in the EU while improving transparency and protecting participants. The regulation must be applied to all clinical trials conducted in the EU, regardless of whether the sponsor or the trial participants are based in the EU. When it comes to translations, the EU CTR has a significant impact on the requirements for clinical trials conducted in the EU.
The CTR states that all documents related to a clinical trial must be translated into the language(s) of the trial participants. This means that sponsors of clinical trials in the EU must make sure that all relevant documents are translated into the languages spoken by the trial participants. Moreover, the EU CTR requires that all documents submitted to regulatory authorities in the EU must be translated into the official language(s) of the member state where the trial is being held.
It's important to note that translations must be done by professional translators and reviewed by someone with a good understanding of the scientific content. This ensures that translations are accurate and consistent with the original documents. The CTR also requires sponsors to keep records of all translations, including the name of the translator, the date of the translation, and any changes made during the translation process.
While the EU CTR's translation requirements can be seen as an added burden to the already complex process of conducting a clinical trial, it ensures that patient-facing materials are easily understood by the trial participants and that the scientific content is accurately translated for regulatory authorities.
Using a language service provider (LSP) for EU CTR translation can provide several benefits:
- Expertise in medical and scientific translation
LSPs typically have teams of professional translators with specialized knowledge in medical and scientific terminology, which is essential for accurately translating clinical trial documents.
- Quality assurance
LSPs typically have quality assurance processes in place to ensure the accuracy and consistency of translations. This can provide peace of mind that the translations meet regulatory requirements and protect the integrity of the trial.
- Time-saving
LSPs can handle the translation process efficiently and quickly, allowing sponsors to focus on other aspects of the trial.
- Compliance with regulations
LSPs are familiar with the CTR and other regulations related to clinical trials and can ensure that translations comply with these regulations.
- Language support
LSPs can provide translations in multiple languages, which is essential for clinical trials conducted in the EU, where trial participants may speak different languages.
- Cost-effective
LSPs can provide translation services at a lower cost than in-house translation teams, especially for multiple languages, and can also help with regulatory document formatting and submission.
In summary, using a language service provider for EU CTR translation can provide expertise, quality assurance, time-saving, compliance with regulations, language support, and cost-effectiveness.
Consider these factors to ensure readiness for compliance with the EU CTR:
- Protocol compliance: Ensure that the clinical trial protocol follows the CTR's guidelines for trial design, conduct, and reporting.
- Informed consent: Confirm that patient-facing materials, including informed consent forms, are translated into languages used by trial participants.
- Regulatory documentation: Ensure that all relevant study documents, such as the clinical trial protocol and investigator's brochure, are translated into official languages of the member state and comply with CTR requirements.
- Ethics approval: Verify that an ethics committee has approved the trial according to CTR requirements.
- Adverse event reporting: Check that the adverse event reporting system complies with CTR requirements, including timely reporting of serious adverse events to regulatory authorities.
- Quality assurance: Establish a robust quality assurance process to ensure translation accuracy and consistency, and keep records of all translations and any changes made.
- Transparency: Comply with the CTR's transparency requirements, including creating a trial master file and submitting information to the EudraCT database.
- Investigator's brochure: Ensure that the Investigator's brochure contains all the necessary information required by the CTR and is up-to-date.
- Data protection: Confirm that the trial process complies with EU data protection regulations, including GDPR.
- Cybersecurity: Establish adequate cybersecurity measures to protect trial-generated data.
Our in-depth whitepaper on EU CTR offers strategic considerations for sponsors as well as insights on the clinical trial submission process.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption whitepaper
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel