Discover how in-home services and a global development strategy can help us get closer to more effective treatments.
Today’s evolving clinical trials landscape, which has been severely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, provides an opportunity to challenge the HIV prevention and treatment clinical research paradigm, particularly the design of HIV vaccine efficacy trials. To do this, sponsors must start by closely examining the use of active controls, study populations, standards of prevention, primary or surrogate endpoints and biomarkers when designing such trials. More importantly, they need to take into consideration the diverse cultural, lifestyle and biological circumstances that influence individual decision-making around the use of HIV prevention strategies, which can evolve over the course of a study.
Specifically, people at risk for, or living with, HIV face the challenges of stigma and discrimination, both of which are known to negatively affect quality of life, as well as treatment outcomes. Therefore, sponsors will need to be aware of the societal stigma associated with HIV, including the possible reluctance to participate in HIV clinical trials. As such, sponsors will need to provide sensitivity training to staff and sites. For example, rather than providing smartphones for collecting patient diaries, sponsors may consider BYOD (bring your own device) to reduce stigmas, as patients may be questioned about why and how they received these new devices.
Designing patient-centric clinical trials for people at risk for, or living with, HIV
Given the unique challenges associated with HIV vaccine efficacy trials, sponsors should consider employing a decentralised, patient-centric alternative to the traditional on-site model, such as a hybrid design, which would incorporate three elements: in-home services, virtual visits and an end-to-end participant engagement platform (i.e., a study app). This option would not only enhance trial recruitment, but also promote study compliance.
Through home health care services, for example, sponsors could deploy trained nurses and teams to conduct visits in the participant’s home, which could reduce the travel burden on participants and their families. What’s more, home visits offered outside normal business hours could accommodate participants’ schedules, further facilitating better compliance.
Virtual visits using telemedicine, would allow the investigator to observe the participant, instruct them to complete assessments and record their observations, without having to travel to the patient’s home. In addition, providing a study app with notifications, reminders and surveys would allow for communication and remote data collection directly from the participant, creating better engagement. Using this strategy, the investigator and study team would not have to wait for a participant to attend an on-site visit for data collection or download, creating efficiency and saving time. Having the participant app provided via a digital tool, such as a smartphone, also would allow the participant to have one access point for recording data, thereby easing the burden on participants and study teams.
Keeping HIV clinical trials on track amid a pandemic
Ongoing clinical trials with patients at risk for, or living with HIV, have felt the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. By implementing the new strategies outlined above, sponsors can better manage these clinical trials and reduce the risk of infection to trial participants and staff. For example, incorporating decentralised elements – such as home health care and/or other alternative site solutions – into an HIV clinical trial can ensure uninterrupted access to HIV treatments and services, while further reducing contact with clinics.
As the current pandemic has led to the increase in the use of decentralisation, sponsors are beginning to consider making these new strategies a permanent part of protocols.
For more information about infectious disease clinical research, read our latest whitepaper.
Learn more about home health care and decentralised clinical models here: ICONplc.com/dct.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel