Over the past year, the COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted clinical research across the lifecycle including recruitment challenges, protocol amendments and delayed market entry.
At the root of many of these setbacks is disrupted manufacturing and supply chain processes. This holds particularly true for cell therapies, which already required additional considerations when it comes to processing, packaging and shipping compared to traditional biologic drugs.
Because cell therapies are fundamentally “living therapies,” orchestrating the logistics for both source materials and final doses of these therapies requires detailed planning and hands-on management. The end-to-end processes of tracking and tracing the movement and handoffs of these shipments among stakeholders are rife with risk and potential points of failure. With this in mind, cell therapy developers have had to adopt flexible strategies to adapt to the evolving COVID-19 landscape. Here we discuss the unique challenges of manufacturing cell therapies, and how restrictions caused by the pandemic have placed additional pressures on developers.
Exploring the unique challenges of cell therapy development
Part of what makes the development of cell therapies so unique is that they require the use of living cells, either from a donor (allogenic) or from a patient’s own cells (autologous). Using autologous cell therapies often means the manufacturing process must accommodate for the variability in the source patient’s cells to consistently produce a final product that has the desired attributes. With this in mind, it is critical that cell therapy developers maintain the chain-of-identity for each product starting with initial collection to transportation throughout the manufacturing process until the final product is administered. Each handoff must be closely monitored and samples require detailed tracking and tracing.
Moreover, these therapies require highly coordinated schedules for each stakeholder and delivery timelines. For example, because manufacturing capacity can be a critical factor for autologous therapies, schedules need to be coordinated between labs, apheresis centers, specialty couriers and the manufacturing centre to collect the cells and ship them overnight to the manufacturing facility. These refrigerated shipments are time sensitive, requiring the manufacturer to be ready to start the process upon receipt. As such, disruption at any point of this process can pose risks for both the product and the patient.
In addition to shipment scheduling, these trials require a high level of coordination for patients. Cell therapy trials often require patients to travel to specialty centers to receive treatment. As such, close coordination between sites, patients and their caregivers is necessary. Any change in the schedule can affect the entire workflow of the trial, and can result in errors with regards to maintaining the chain of custody of the product.
Additional considerations during COVID-19
Due to the increased demands of cell therapy trials and the delicate nature of these products, restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic have created a significant threat to these trials compared to traditional biologic products. For example, the closure of borders and reduced air traffic can affect the supply chain to and from clinical research sites, resulting in delayed transport of resources. Shortages of supplies have, in some cases, caused service providers to shut down entirely. Because transport logistics are so critical for cell therapies, closure of clinical research sites can put the viability of entire trials at risk. Moreover, with many of these therapies requiring hands-on management and temperature monitoring, flight delays due to COVID-19 have been a primary concern for cell therapy developers.
To compound the issue of clinical sites being shut down and supply chains being delayed, some apheresis centers chose to reduce schedules or stop operating entirely in an effort to limit the exposure of site staff to COVID-19. For sites concerned about exposing vulnerable patients to the virus, appointments may have been delayed or cancelled. This prevented participants from having access to therapies and negatively affected enrolment and retention of patients. To mitigate this challenge moving forward, restricted access to healthcare facilities as well as new COVID-19 safety and screening procedures should be included in protocols.
Conclusion
The restrictions imposed by COVID-19 have resulted in disruptions to clinical research including changes to site procedures, patient re-scheduling and shipment delays. Until COVID-19 vaccines have been widely administered, these challenges are anticipated to persist. Continuing to find ways to ensure supply chain resilience and keep development programmes on track requires ongoing innovation and flexibility. To learn more about how ICON can help keep your trial on track during COVID-19, please visit: /solutions/clinical-and-scientific-operations/covid-19/.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel