Jack L. Martin, MD
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the implementation of more efficient trial designs and operational execution, especially with regard to cardiovascular (CV) studies.
A greater number of alternative trial designs are emerging, given that this approach eases site and patient burden, and may facilitate responses to unforeseen risks to study execution. These include both fully decentralised studies which negates the requirement for the subjects to attend the traditional site, or more commonly a hybrid model, where site visits are reduced. Also, a rise in the use of digital health technologies — and in particular, wearable cardiac devices — along with home health and telehealth, may improve monitoring of clinical trial participants.
The increased use of cardiac devices was apparent even before the COVID-19 pandemic, with the wearable cardiac device market expected to grow to $6.2 billion by 2026, a CAGR of 22 percent, according to Global Market Insights1. One of the reasons for this growth is the impact of the coronavirus on CV patients, and an increasing number of initiatives to better understand and monitor this vulnerable patient population. Here, we review the digital health technologies impacting CV trials and the implications for future clinical research.
Using digital health technologies for remote monitoring to keep patients safe
More than ever, wearables are being used for remote monitoring, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Where appropriate and permitted, these devices can minimise physical patient contact by healthcare providers. The use of mobile electrocardiograms (ECGs), for instance, can generate important safety and efficacy data outside the study centre in real time, and aid the investigator in oversight without ever having to come into contact with the subject.
More importantly, there are a growing array of ECG connected devices that can capture digital endpoints that range from a simple rhythm strip to advanced analysis determined from a single, six- or 12-lead ECG. For example, the Nuubo ECG Vest, has been designed with the patients' comfort in mind and can be used to capture 2 channel ECG continuously for up to 30 days2.
Realising the full potential of remote patient monitoring to keep trial subjects safe during the pandemic, in June 2020, the FDA updated a guidance allowing manufacturers of certain FDA-cleared, non-invasive wearable devices to expand their use during the COVID-19 emergency3. This includes devices that measure common parameters of interest in CV trials such as blood pressure, pulse oximetry, activity levels and heart sounds via an electronic stethoscope.
In addition, there are a growing number of biosensors, such as patches from Vitalconnect and BioSticker™ from BioIntelliSense, which facilitates the collection of vital signs for 30 days. There are also interesting advances in the area of wrist-worn biosensors where devices are combining accelerometers with PPG sensors. These devices could be used to measure activity and sleep in addition to heart rate, respiration rate, SPO2, skin impedance (stress), temperature, blood pressure and other physiological endpoints. A number of companies have made great strides in this area including Apple, Philips, Withings, Samsung, Biobeat, Omron and Oura Ring.
Enhancing trial efficiency and patient engagement with digital health technologies
The use of wearable devices to capture and transmit patient data remotely and in (near) real-time not only can improve patient safety, but also can enhance clinical trial efficiency and patient engagement. For example, a phase 3, randomised clinical trial called CHIEF-HF (Canagliflozin: Impact on Health Status, Quality of Life and Functional Status in Heart Failure) is evaluating whether canagliflozin, a medicine for type 2 diabetes, can improve the quality of life in patients with heart failure4. This 2000-adult fully decentralised trial enrolled study participants with and without diabetes, and used a FitBit to measure changes in physical activity to support a secondary endpoint in a phase 3 trial. Even though the trial started at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, it was able to launch and enroll patients when other trials were suspended or cancelled because the patient research was conducted remotely.
Moreover, new technology can be used to improve data quality in clinical trials by making data collection more complete or by filling in missing data. An example of this would be iRhythm Technologies’ Zio patch, which is being used by the University of California, San Francisco, to monitor heart rhythms in patients who have had COVID-19 infection5. Here, researchers are using deep machine learning to analyse the data with the hope that it can inform the short- and long-term effects of the virus on the heart.
Applying collected data, from clinical status to novel digital endpoints
In addition to improving clinical trial efficiency, the data collected from connected devices can be stored for future analysis or used in real-time where emergent intervention may be required. Connected device generated data can inform:
- Clinical status, such as when using QardioMD platform that allows the clinician to remotely monitor blood pressure, Sp02 levels (or blood oxygen saturation), heart rate, blood glucose and temperature at home. The data are analysed and used to generate a patient’s status, flagging those that are at high risk6.
- Medication adherence, an array of connected solutions can help support patients taking their medication with smartwatch or smartphone reminders7 that can be linked to smart pillboxes and smart bottles.
- Effects of certain patient actions on health outcomes, such as measuring the frequency of exercise and its impact on patients with CV diseases.
- Generation of novel digital endpoints that are more responsive to change than traditional assessment8.
Choosing digital health technologies for CV trials
As demonstrated, digital health technologies can help to minimise COVID-19-related disruptions to CV clinical trials and can expand the potential for real-world evidence to streamline data collection, potentially reducing trial costs and timelines. In fact, the era of COVID-19 has already accelerated the use of these technologies.
With the increased use of devices and sensors in clinical studies, there is a heightened awareness with respect to the selection of an appropriate device that supports the specific use case. Digital health technologies can reduce the need for clinical site attendance and enable data collection beyond the traditional clinical setting. When using a device to generate digital endpoints there needs to be sufficient scientific evidence to support that specific use case9 and the generation of an evidence dossier for regulatory submission. The same principles with respect to robust and reliable data also apply novel digital endpoints. Consideration is required for some of the unique operational issues, such as the logistics, device importation and site training. Once a valid data set has been determined, a robust documented process with respect to patient training, support and wear-time compliance monitoring is required. Data management and analysis, including strategies for handling source data, missing data and decisions on the integration of data into EDC, require specific knowledge and expertise.
At ICON, we have built a team with proven cardiovascular and digital health technologies expertise. Our team has gained operational expertise from conducting more than 50 digital health technology studies across multiple disease area and phases. In addition, our experts have built a framework based on best practices to support device selection and validation of novel digital endpoints.
Discover more by reading our white paper “Mitigating the impact of COVID-19 on cardiovascular trials.” Or contact us to speak with our experts about how we can help to keep your study on track.
Download the whitepaper
References:
(1) Research Dive. Global Wearable Cardiac Devices Market to Witness a Tremendous Growth Due to COVID-19 Pandemic - Exclusive Report. August 2020. https://www.prnewswire.com/
(2) Nuubo. 2020.
(3) Enforcement Policy for Non-Invasive Remote Monitoring Devices Used to Support Patient Monitoring During the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) Public Health Emergency (Revished). Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. Food and Drug Administration. June 2020. https://www.fda.gov/media/136290/download
(4) A Study on Impact of Canagliflozin on Health Status, Quality of Life, and Functional Status in Heart Failure (CHIEF-HF). 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
(5) Lim, Dion and Didion, Tim. UCSF studies how coronavirus attacks the human heart. ABC7 News. May 2020. https://abc7news.com/
(6) Qardio, Inc. 2020. https://www.getqardio.com/qardiomd-covid19/
(7) Dobkowski, Darlene. Smartwatch notifications improve medication adherence for AF. Healio and Cardiology Today. May 2020. https://www.healio.com/news/cardiology/
(8) https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/04/08/
(9) Bill Byrom, et al. Selection of and Evidentiary Considerations for Wearable Devices and Their Measurements for Use in Regulatory Decision Making: Recommendations from the ePRO Consortium. Value in Health 11/2017; 21(6)., DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.012
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption whitepaper
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel