Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, combined with big data, hold the potential to solve many key clinical trial challenges.
These include increasing trial efficiency through better protocol design, patient enrolment and retention, and study start-up, which were each named as prime candidates for improvement by nearly 40 percent of sponsors in a recent ICON-Pharma Intelligence survey(1). With clinical trials accounting for 40 percent of pharma research budgets(2), sponsors need new ways to accelerate timelines and reduce costs.
Data-driven protocols and strategies powered by advanced AI algorithms processing data collected from mobile sensors and apps, electronic medical and administrative records, and other sources have the potential to reduce trial costs. They achieve this by improving data quality, increasing patient compliance & retention, and identifying treatment efficacy more efficiently and reliably than ever before.
As a result, fewer patients are needed to generate statistically significant study data, and fewer patients drop out. Adopting these novel innovations does present challenges, with developing analytics that generate actionable clinical insights from big data high among them.
Nonetheless, there exists significant potential for transforming trials, for example potentially uncovering routes to new therapeutic options in masses of data that may not be found by humans alone.
Improving Pharma R&D efficiency
In our industry survey and whitepaper, 'Improving Pharma R&D Efficiency' when asked what technologies would have the most impact improving clinical trial efficiency, the top answer from survey respondents was leveraging big data and AI at 36 percent.
Advancing clinical trials
The AI transformation of clinical trials starts with protocol development, reducing or replacing outcome assessments that may be more responsive to change than traditional methods and utilising remote connected technologies that reduce the need for patients to travel long distances for sites visits. Relying on traditional site based outcome assessments can lead to less than optimal protocol design can slow enrolment and lead to poor patient retention, driving up trial costs or even dooming a programme.
Applying AI to big data has the potential to shape insights from masses of real-world data (RWD) into protocol designs. Objective data from devices and sensors captured in real time data from individuals as they go about their normal lives has the potential to capture more meaningful clinically relevant insights and be used to assess and develop trial objectives, endpoints and procedures.
In the past, researchers relied heavily on verbal or written evidence from patients at clinical visits and direct clinic observations to assess patient progress. This subjective evidence can be unreliable, prone to inter and intra rater variability and not provide enough information for analytics and decision making and while patient reported outcomes are a key component of any trial, the addition of objective data to add context to the subjective assessment particularly when machine learning and AI platforms can be used.
Gathering real-time, real-world patient data with wearable devices, on the other hand, can help produce consistent, objective evidence of actual disease states and impacts of drug efficacy on disease symptoms. Today there are a vast range of biometric signals that can be captured including heart rate, blood pressure and sleep and activity collected 24/7. It is much richer and more detailed than data collected in the clinic, and has the potential to be more responsive to change.
AI analysis of live remote data also can detect when patients may not be compliant, allowing clinical personnel to intervene before a patient’s data must be excluded. Sponsors already recognise big data can help solve these kinds of problems - 28 percent of the ICON-Pharma Intelligence survey respondents reported that big data will help clinical trial operations.
Engaging patients and finding new insights
AI-enabled trial management systems can help keep patients engaged. Technologies such as digital reporting apps, as well as wearables, allow for real-time engagement and communication, and support patient-centric trials. Patients can send feedback on treatment symptoms and manage medication intake, and can share information with researchers, reducing or eliminating the need for patients to travel to sites, which increases patient adherence and compliance.
Moreover, reducing the frequency of clinical visits can lower site costs, and improve quality of patient experience on the trial (fewer and shorter clinic visits).
AI analysis of RWD-generated by mHealth technologies not only allows for the monitoring of objective high-quality data in real-time as patients live their lives, but also helps find clinically relevant signals among masses of data not possible using current analytic techniques. With advanced analytics, researchers can gain deeper insights into how a treatment affects symptom progression or quality of life. Moreover, expertise in machine learning can help to develop novel endpoints.
AI analysis of big data has the potential to generate new insights into disease processes that could open up new treatment avenues. It has the ability to advance the concept of personalised medicine by identifying patients most likely to respond to specific treatments based on their individual characteristics and responses to previous treatment.
This will reduce the risk of drug development by creating predictive models that are much more powerful, increasing chances that a given therapy will work in clinical trials. More importantly, it will bring more innovative products to patients sooner, transforming not only clinical trials, but also the health and lives of millions of patients as well.
References
1. Transforming Clinical Trials Industry Survey. ICON-Pharma Intelligence. November 2017.
2. Nuttall, Aidan. RDP Clinical Outsourcing: Considerations For Improving Patient Recruitment Into Clinical Trials (2012).
3 Brazil, R. Artificial Intelligence: will it change the way drugs are discovered? The Pharmaceutical Journal, December 7, 2017.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel